Republican Presidential candidate Jon Huntsman qualified Herman Cain’s many sexual allegations and Cain’s thirteen year alleged extramarital affair as “bimbo eruptions.”
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/11/29/9104180-huntsman-bimbo-eruptions-cause-for-cain-reconsideration
While I understand that Huntsman was trying to make the point that the media focuses on fluff and scandal too often, I take umbrage at his referring to the alleged sexual harassment victims, and the woman in which Cain is said to have had a thirteen-year affair with, as bimbos. Too often the victims are made to feel as if they did something wrong, that they asked for it. Where is Cain’s responsibility in this?
Cain called Ginger White “destitute” and “desperate,” stating that that is why he helped her. I see that statement as a double-edged sword. Cain seems to make it a practice to prey on women which he feels are vulnerable. The two women that each settled a sexual harassment suit with the NRA were employees of Cain’s. He held their jobs in the palm of his hand. Then we have Sharon Bialek that was offered “help” by Cain. When she rebuffed his advances he responded, “You want a job, right?”
So when Huntsman asks, “‘What about a (financial) downgrade that is being anticipated? What about Europe? What about so many other issues out there that we ought to be talking about and that people ought to understand where candidates come down on those issues?’” I say, yes, let’s talk about those issues as well, but you’d be wise to remember this:
Female victims of sexual harassment and sexual assault are not “bimbos,” Mr. Huntsman; they are your daughters, your wives, your mothers.